Looks like the MSM got caught with its pants down ... again. Here's a "correction" where the NYT editors inserted their own language, falsely attributed to a soldier, which 'accidently' totally misrepresented his point of view...

"The Op-Ed page in some copies yesterday carried an incorrect version of an article about military recruitment. The writer, an Army reserve officer, did not say, "Imagine my surprise the other day when I received orders to report to Fort Campbell, Ky., next Sunday," nor did he characterize his recent call-up to active duty as the precursor to a "surprise tour of Iraq." That language was added by an editor and was to have been removed before the article was published."

What the heck does this "mistake" say about the bias of the NYT editors???