See TB's posts on the subject for more. Is that what you mean?
Or, to state the issue in simple language (though I've done it here before):
Voter ID laws and other laws that make it more complicated to vote than it used to be are a ploy by Republican run state legislatures to discourage more liberals from voting than it discourages conservatives from voting. This results in a net win for Republicans. I think it is downright immoral to do this in a democracy.
The denialists say that there are innocent reasons for passing all these laws. But when one of the guys in charge of the Republican party says something like : "Think about this, we cut Obama by five percent, which was big. A lot of people lost sight of that. He won, he beat McCain by 10 percent, he only beat Romney by five percent. I think that probably voter ID helped a bit in that."
or when one of the guys promoting such laws says "Voter ID, which is gonna allow Governor Romney to win the state of Pennsylvania, done,”,
then I think it's pretty clear what the reason for passing these laws really is.
Did I make it plain, this time? Or did I miss it again?
Flame » in reply to I know you meant to inform
See Steve's post below for some illumination of what a denialist (concerning this topic) is.
The whole thread (9 posts)
- For the denialists in the crowd
