Yeah, I've seen it all before, and have posted a lot of it here myself. I notice that references to Duelfer's investigation seem to constantly overlook his key findings, as well as an extensive history of Iraq attempting to deceive the U.N. and others about what they were doing and how.

Also, the article blurs together information known ahead of the war with information known only afterwards. There is still nothing to indicate deliberate deception as opposed to error.

BTW, General Hussein Kamal's interview was in August of 1995. If the inescapable conclusion to be drawn from this interview was that Iraq had no WMD left, and no means to produce any, how do you explain Desert Fox?