re: And new craters, too

Space/Science » in reply to re: And new craters, too

Marcus — 9/21/2005 2:09:21 PM (archived)

Just taken a quick look, but it seems to me that the higher resolution of the latter images would explain the greater detail 'emergence' of the gullys in question. The experience seems like an out of focus camera slowly coming into focus.

The whole thread (18 posts)

Whoa, new gullies forming on Mars! - Robert Clark - 9/20/2005 5:16:41 PM
- re: Whoa, new gullies forming on Mars! - Robert Clark - 9/22/2005 5:11:24 AM
- You bet I like it. - Nick Hoffman - 9/21/2005 8:28:40 AM
  - re: You bet I like it. - dtb - 9/22/2005 3:07:47 AM
  - Here's another idea... - Tom Brosz - 9/21/2005 4:56:58 PM
    - Unlikely, Tom - Nick Hoffman - 9/22/2005 8:11:23 AM
  - This is a little out of my field, but... - Tom Brosz - 9/21/2005 4:54:36 PM
    - What if it isn't water... - LJK - 9/21/2005 5:15:37 PM
      - It isn't water. - et - 9/21/2005 6:44:35 PM
        
        Could still be water. - Robert Clark - 9/27/2005 10:26:58 AM
  - I think you deserve a nobel prize... - Scott Evil - 9/21/2005 1:47:12 PM
    - Or at least they'll name a crater after you, Nick. ;-) (n/t) - Jacob Samorodin - 9/21/2005 11:33:41 PM
- re: Whoa, new gullies forming on Mars! - Raoul - 9/20/2005 5:27:02 PM
  - And new craters, too - LJK - 9/20/2005 7:10:44 PM
    - Crater rate 5x lower than standard estimate - dtb - 9/20/2005 8:44:49 PM
      - Malin puts itself in the crater counting business - EP - 9/21/2005 2:29:13 PM
    - re: And new craters, too - Raoul - 9/20/2005 7:55:09 PM
      - re: And new craters, too - Marcus - 9/21/2005 2:09:21 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (18 posts)