Current Events — HabitableZone

Current Events » in reply to Well, according to Scott, Bush is in the act of outsmarting us all.

I don't know if Bush ever read the book...

but I'd bet any amount of money that Rove has read Sun Tsu. Chapter 2 comes to mind (emphasis added):

1. Sun Tzu said: In the practical art of war, the best thing of all is to take the enemy's country whole and intact; to shatter and destroy it is not so good. So, too, it is better to recapture an army entire than to destroy it, to capture a regiment, a detachment or a company entire than to destroy them.

2. Hence to fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting.

3. Thus the highest form of generalship is to balk the enemy's plans; the next best is to prevent the junction of the enemy's forces; the next in order is to attack the enemy's army in the field; and the worst policy of all is to besiege walled cities.


NOTE: While DC isn't physically walled, the mindset within the Beltway is mentally walled with little connection to the real world that lies beyond in "flyover country."

4. The rule is, not to besiege walled cities if it can possibly be avoided. The preparation of mantlets (shields), movable shelters, and various implements of war, will take up three whole months; and the piling up of mounds over against the walls will take three months more.

5. The general, unable to control his irritation, will launch his men to the assault like swarming ants, with the result that one-third of his men are slain, while the town still remains untaken. Such are the disastrous effects of a siege.

6. Therefore the skillful leader subdues the enemy's troops without any fighting; he captures their cities without laying siege to them; he overthrows their kingdom without lengthy operations in the field.

7. With his forces intact he will dispute the mastery of the Empire, and thus, without losing a man, his triumph will be complete. This is the method of attacking by stratagem.


Bush's goal, I believe, is to get a conservative vote on the Supreme Court. If he can do it without the battle that so many seem to clamor for, then so much the better.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (25 posts)