The sources quoted in the Seattle Times article were pretty moderate. However, there have been much stronger statements from groups like the Family Research Council, Focus on the Family, Concerned WOmen for America, etc -- the usual list of pro-abstinence outfits.
That being said, it seems those groups are moderating their stance compared to what I read when there was some discussion of this in the blogosphere a few months ago. Given just how effective the vaccine has turned out to be and the public reaction their were seeing -- or even due to actual reason, perhaps -- they seem to be heading towards being ok with vaccination being the default for all girls as long as opt-out is possible.
Off Topic » in reply to Read the article again.
re: Read the article again.
