The FBI's chronology of Mohammed Atta's time in Florida completely contradicts that of a military's investigation out of Tampa called "Able Danger". There is a large gaping hole in the timeline, to the point that the FBI had Able Dangers' intelligence on Atta thrown out while completing their official 9/11 Investigative report.
WHY do such glaring inconsistencies get pushed through? Why are we being sold a bill of goods of NO good? There are plenty of witnesses who KNEW (and can prove) that Mohammed Atta was in the US months before the FBI said he was.
Not only that, but a Dept. of Agriculture loan analyst actually worked with Mohammed Atta during the time the FBI said Mohammed wasn't in the country. He applied for a loan for $650,000 to start a crop-dusting business. His plan was to buy a six-seater twin-prop and then remove the seats. "He wanted to build a chemical tank that would fit inside the aircraft and take up every available square inch of the aircraft except for where the pilot would be sitting."
Before Atta left her office he filled out a loan application.
Aren't you the slightest bit suspicious or nauseous of WHY we're being lied to <here?>
Back to 9/11 Unanswered Questions
