Is this bullshit?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4830362.stm
or this?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4827424.stm
or perhaps any of these...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4777214.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3701941.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4718666.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4713846.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/4284838.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3370979.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4606350.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4283255.stm
I'm not for one minute suggesting that all troops do is abuse civilians and prisoners, but to suggest that it's not happening at all is, to put it mildly, bullshit. With a regular, proven history of abuse in Iraq, you HAVE to admit that when a new report comes in, chances are there's more than a shred of truth about it.
Doug
Current Events » in reply to Of course, Bowser instantly believes this.
re: Of course, Bowser instantly believes this.
