As per your post below, I think the more detailed theories that these papers describe are beyond the understanding of most people. Based on my own understanding, I'd rather accept my own theory which seems to me to be a very simple, well rounded explanation of cosmology. It doesn't have any infinities, singularities, any Big Rips, or any Dark Energy.

What I'd like to know is: How was I able to come up with such a simple model that seems to explain everything, and yet professional journals continue to publish stuff about Big Rip, Big Crunch, Dark Energy, singularities, White Holes, Infinities, et cetera. What have I missed? What did I get wrong? Why don't I see any theories resembling my own in those journals?