That's quite a list. Although your linked story to TWS hardly substantiates it.... Where did you get it? If you made it, perhaps you could fill in the blanks a bit better.

10.) Wilson claims he is a non-partisain centrist.

Where? DO you think that if he'd actually found proof of Iraqi attempts to acquire yellowcake in Niger that he'd cover it up?

9.) Wilson claims that the CIA provided him with documents related to Iraq/Niger uranium.

He was provided with nothing before being sent by the CIA to Niger?


8.) Wilson claimed he was a victom of a partisan smear campain.

This post proves that he is I believe.


7.) Wilson claims his book will enrich the debate and people will take him seriously.

Sure. It's a book tour. He's comitting the lie of marketing.


6.) Wilson claims his wife didn’t suggest to her supervisors he take the 1999 trip to Niger.

1999?


5.) Wilson claims that documents about Niger uranium were forged.

Which documents? The British report?


4.) Wilson claimed that the vice-presidents office wanted him to go to Niger.
3.) Wilson claimed that the vice-president was briefed on his Niger report.

These two are just fluff. Obviously the VP's office didn't want an impartial inquiry into this matter. However, if the inquires the VP made to CIA lead to a fact finding mission



2.) Wilson claims his Niger report is conclusive and signifiant.

Then smear the white house as liars also. After being ignored through back channels for months he published the NYT story. Shortly thereafter, the WH retracted the Niger claim made in the SOTU speech.

1.) Wilson denies that his wife suggested he go to Niger in 2002.



The guys credability is gone, even in his book he contradicts himself regarding the Niger episode and the Intellegent Committee’s report shows his report is garbage.

I still find it amazing how some love to make that claim after one of these easily perforated smear attempts

Hard to believe some of the media is still favoring Wilson.

Hard to believe you think this is about favoring anyone.