If you get past the headline...
Not all the experts quoted in the article agree. But it's obvious the news writer, or at least the editor (who writes the headers) knew what he wanted when he went in. The conference is still ongoing, and the papers being presented are legion, and largely mind-numbing.
This article is a good example of how one side of the discussion gets "blessed" by the media, and the other side gets dismissed (note the clever use of "many" and "not all.") Note also that Holland got the headline, not Gray.
I'm still wondering what that "federal employees" bit was supposed to imply.