The Cranky Titles Chosen by Controversialists

Space/Science » in reply to The Faulty Assumptions of the Expanding-Universe Model vs. the Simple and Consistent Principles of a Flat-Universe Model

Adam — 5/11/2006 11:42:58 AM (archived)

Hi LJK

I saw that one too, but it seemed rather 'cranky'. The odd English is forgivable in a Chinese speaker, but the bombast is a bit out-of-place for a physics paper.

Adam

The whole thread (12 posts)

Why the Cosmological Constant Is Small ? - Andrew - 5/6/2006 7:24:44 PM
- re: astro-ph/0605213 - don't know - 5/11/2006 10:33:49 PM
- Kind of depressing - Adam - 5/6/2006 11:48:52 PM
  - re: Kind of depressing - Andrew - 5/8/2006 3:11:51 PM
    - We are physically small, but not insignificant - ljk - 5/8/2006 7:48:52 PM
      - Why the cosmological constant is small and positive - LJK - 5/9/2006 8:02:49 PM
        
        Coincidence of Universe age in $\Lambda$CDM and Milne cosmologies - ljk - 5/9/2006 8:07:24 PM
        
        The Faulty Assumptions of the Expanding-Universe Model vs. the Simple and Consistent Principles of a Flat-Universe Model - ljk - 5/10/2006 3:19:39 PM
        
        The Cranky Titles Chosen by Controversialists - Adam - 5/11/2006 11:42:58 AM
        
        The vacuum energy crisis - ljk - 5/11/2006 8:45:03 PM
        
        The acceleration of the universe and the physics behind it - ljk - 5/15/2006 7:54:46 PM
        
        Why there is something so close to nothing: towards a fundamental theory of the cosmological constant - ljk - 5/16/2006 4:12:46 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (12 posts)