re: executions in one month

Current Events » in reply to Baghdad sees 1,100 executions in one month

Tom Brosz — 5/11/2006 12:16:43 AM (archived)

No, Lindy. The only differences were that the executions under Saddam for the most part weren't in the news.

You obviously didn't even read the article. The 1,100 number is crap, and the number of deaths due to executions isn't even given.

The whole thread (9 posts)

Baghdad sees 1,100 executions in one month - Lindy - 5/10/2006 6:26:05 PM
- "Before the truth can get its boots on" - Tom Brosz - 5/11/2006 3:32:14 PM
- re: executions in one month - Tom Brosz - 5/11/2006 12:16:43 AM
  - I read the article... - et - 5/11/2006 1:32:06 AM
    - A little more slowly... - Tom Brosz - 5/11/2006 3:18:13 AM
      - "Talabani said 1,091 people were KILLED in Baghdad alone last month" - et - 5/11/2006 6:46:59 PM
        
        Look at Lindy's original link. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 5/11/2006 7:29:31 PM
        
        You're right. He overquoted the number of killings by 300 deaths. Still, the kernel of her post is still valid. (n/t) - et - 5/12/2006 5:35:50 PM
        
        All Tom is quibbling about is the word "executions" (n/t) - Tony - 5/12/2006 7:42:19 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (9 posts)