Um, we actually "do" know what happened in Benghazi.

Current Events » in reply to 60 Minutes retracts Benghazi report

RobVG — 11/9/2013 5:50:20 PM (archived)

I heard the report on NPR yesterday. What they said was, he lied to the FBI and the CIA because he wasn't supposed to be there. According to them, this automatically disqualifies him as a source. Of course he claims he's being slandered.

But this should sweep the whole thing back under the rug nicely. You can once again snuggle with the notion the administration really didn't know what was happening.

A comforting thought...

The whole thread (12 posts)

60 Minutes retracts Benghazi report - hank - 11/9/2013 1:13:53 PM
- Um, we actually "do" know what happened in Benghazi. - RobVG - 11/9/2013 5:50:20 PM
  - Lying is usually sufficient to disqualify you from being a source. - alcaray - 11/9/2013 10:07:19 PM
    - Not when the source's lies are essential to preserve conservative dogma. n/t - hank - 11/9/2013 11:27:45 PM
      - Remember that Iraqi expatriot who informed the Bush admin about all the WMD programs in Iraq? - alcaray - 11/9/2013 11:37:36 PM
        
        And of course . . . - DanS - 11/10/2013 4:08:07 AM
        
        So you would trust Saddam's word??? - alcaray - 11/10/2013 6:37:21 AM
        
        Hardly . . . - DanS - 11/10/2013 4:02:23 PM
        
        Impeaching the witness was what I thought we were talking about. - alcaray - 11/10/2013 5:23:38 PM
        
        Simply history. (n/t) - DanS - 11/10/2013 5:29:11 PM
  - If I laogh too hard, it really hurts . . . - DanS - 11/9/2013 8:07:23 PM
  - There's a small problem with the liberal thinking process here. - TB - 11/9/2013 7:56:08 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (12 posts)

Related discussions