There's a small problem with the liberal thinking process here.

Current Events » in reply to Um, we actually "do" know what happened in Benghazi.

TB — 11/9/2013 7:56:08 PM (archived)

Before "60 Minutes" decided to use their news show to plug a book, nobody had ever even heard of this guy. The scandal never depended on him before, and it doesn't now.

Meanwhile, more of the real eyewitnesses, largely gagged by the State Department, will be testifying next week.

The whole thread (12 posts)

60 Minutes retracts Benghazi report - hank - 11/9/2013 1:13:53 PM
- Um, we actually "do" know what happened in Benghazi. - RobVG - 11/9/2013 5:50:20 PM
  - Lying is usually sufficient to disqualify you from being a source. - alcaray - 11/9/2013 10:07:19 PM
    - Not when the source's lies are essential to preserve conservative dogma. n/t - hank - 11/9/2013 11:27:45 PM
      - Remember that Iraqi expatriot who informed the Bush admin about all the WMD programs in Iraq? - alcaray - 11/9/2013 11:37:36 PM
        
        And of course . . . - DanS - 11/10/2013 4:08:07 AM
        
        So you would trust Saddam's word??? - alcaray - 11/10/2013 6:37:21 AM
        
        Hardly . . . - DanS - 11/10/2013 4:02:23 PM
        
        Impeaching the witness was what I thought we were talking about. - alcaray - 11/10/2013 5:23:38 PM
        
        Simply history. (n/t) - DanS - 11/10/2013 5:29:11 PM
  - If I laogh too hard, it really hurts . . . - DanS - 11/9/2013 8:07:23 PM
  - There's a small problem with the liberal thinking process here. - TB - 11/9/2013 7:56:08 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (12 posts)

Related discussions