re: Get a clue, here.
Tom, I really don't understand your anger or your outrage. I don't see that it's a huge deal that this guy was a guest columnist instead of a letter-writer; the difference is only the length. When Pat Buchanan's a guest columnist in the MN, he gets (fittingly) half the right-hand page; does the amount of ink mean that he speaks for the Murkie? Dude, you're blowing this way out of proportion.
You're insulting everybody's intelligence, too. Curtis is obvously at the fringe, yet you're upset as if you think meaningful numbers of people will take him seriously. I just don't get why you think he's so important. Why do you take him seriously?