Off Topic » in reply to re: See Farah Fawcett at the EMMYS?

Were we watching the same show?

tony — 8/31/2006 1:06:31 AM (archived)

Kate Jackson then - babalicious

Kate Jackson now :

If Smith's face were pulled any tighter, you'd see her navel as a dimple.

They're definitely keeping the illusion going.

I have no idea why I was watching the Emmys.
Spongebob wan't even nominated.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (20 posts)

• Katie Couric's Digital Diet - Tom Brosz - 8/29/2006 9:13:36 PM
  • See Farah Fawcett at the EMMYS? - carl - 8/30/2006 4:52:55 PM
    • re: See Farah Fawcett at the EMMYS? - Lindy - 8/30/2006 5:19:24 PM
      • COOOL? more like North POLE..... - carl - 8/31/2006 2:03:48 PM
      • Were we watching the same show? - tony - 8/31/2006 1:06:31 AM
  • you don't always need retouching for a good effect - D. - 8/30/2006 4:58:33 AM
    • "D"? - Lindy - 8/30/2006 3:35:00 PM
      • How many D s do you know that post .au links? (n/t) - Tony - 8/30/2006 4:25:24 PM
        • Daniel? - Lindy - 8/30/2006 4:53:30 PM
          • You used to think I was Welsh.... - Tony - 8/30/2006 5:22:43 PM
            • In the old days........ - Lindy - 8/30/2006 5:43:04 PM
  • I prefer the first pic. - Lee - 8/30/2006 3:02:10 AM
    • Cronkite+bones - carl - 8/30/2006 4:56:48 PM
      • re: Cronkite+bones - Tom Brosz - 8/30/2006 5:40:34 PM
        • Network TV and news - carl - 8/31/2006 2:06:31 PM
        • More than it should be, in my opinion. (n/t) - alcaray - 8/30/2006 6:04:41 PM
  • asspect ratio - ER - 8/29/2006 9:35:32 PM
    • re: asspect ratio - Tom Brosz - 8/29/2006 11:26:18 PM
    • Been going on since the 60s that I'm aware of. - alcaray - 8/29/2006 9:47:48 PM
      • Digital cameras focus on revised reality - LJK - 8/30/2006 1:48:43 PM