Assuring Proper Credit
You guys realize I hope that most of the commentary on potential planetary transitions is Mike Brown's? I'm simply taking his many informative insites and throwing out the one criterion of his I consider totally unnecessary and scientifically invalid (not that he claims it is scientitfically valid just practical). It's really weird when the guy you are arguing against is doing most of the heavy lifting in your arguement and conversely actually has the most to gain by having the scientific consensus tilt against his arguement. Maybe it's an underhanded damning with faint praise strategy. ;-)
Regards,
Mark