re: why did they do that? – Space/Science – HabitableZone

Space/Science

Recent posts

Recent posts

Fewer Transient Alerts coming BuckGalaxy November 2, 2026 5:48 pm (Space/Science)
This report from Congress came out last week... podrock November 1, 2026 11:22 pm (Current Events)
Happy Halloween podrock October 31, 2026 3:03 am (Off Topic)
Expect one hell of a recession/depression in 2027 Arrell October 31, 2026 1:16 am (Current Events)
Next week will get ugly.... Arrell October 30, 2026 2:02 pm (Current Events)
Sir Patrick Stewart. podrock October 30, 2026 11:52 am (Off Topic)
Bernie Taupin. A great interview podrock October 30, 2026 3:05 am (Off Topic)
A new Dwarf Planet? Arrell October 30, 2026 12:49 am (Space/Science)
John Wheeler's philosophy: "Beyond the Black Hole" RL October 17, 2025 5:00 am (Space/Science)
"Engage!" BuckGalaxy October 29, 2026 10:58 pm (Off Topic)

On this day in Space/Science

1 year ago (that week) New Glenn set for its second launch on November 9 7 replies · Nov 5, 2025
5 years ago (that week) ZEISS Mineralogic 3D 1 reply · Nov 3, 2021
10 years ago (that week) CO2 to ethanol 0 replies · Nov 1, 2016

Log in
Register

Space/Science » in reply to re: TDRS

re: why did they do that?

Peter Bruener — 12/27/2006 8:47:29 PM (archived)

According to this KSC site, it was to reduce the ground station requirements to one station instead of the two needed for 180 degree spacing.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (5 posts)

I have a question about TDRS coverage of the ISS and Shuttle flights. - DWC - 12/26/2006 10:21:31 PM
- re: TDRS - Raoul - 12/27/2006 6:48:42 AM
  - re: TDRS - DWC - 12/27/2006 4:56:38 PM
    - re: why did they do that? - Peter Bruener - 12/27/2006 8:47:29 PM
    - Radiation zone plays a role, too? - LJK - 12/27/2006 5:10:09 PM

HabitableZone — be civil, or at least entertaining.