Got any concrete proposals for "winning" in there? Nope.
Got an achievable definition of "winning" in there? Nope.

Lets look at the highlights pdf you linked to:
On the US side, what we'll be doing differently is....

A jobs creation program
Increase in troops
Something nebulous and vaguely threatening about Iran and Syria.

20 something slight changes in numbers/deployments of military, about 4 or 5 changes to civilian approach.
That last one is exactly the wrong way around.

Most of the rest, if proposed by a democrat would have been thoroughly fisked by you as meaning absolutely nothing.
Come on, there are 8 key objectives that for each and every one, you could driven a convoy of WMD laden trucks bound for Syria through if you took your partisan blinkers off for a moment.

1.Defeat al-Qaida and its supporters and ensure that no terrorist safe havenexists in Iraq.
2.Support Iraqi efforts to quell sectarian violence in Baghdad andregain control over the capital.
3.Ensure the territorial integrity of Iraq and counter/limit destructive Iranian and Syrian activity in Iraq.
4.Help safeguard democracy in Iraq by encouraging strong democratic institutions impartially serving all Iraqis and preventing the return of the forces of tyranny.
5.Foster the conditions for Iraqi national reconciliation but withthe Iraqi Government clearly in the lead.
6.Continue to strengthen Iraqi Security Forces and accelerate the transition of security responsibility to the Iraqi Government.
7.Encourage an expanding Iraqi economy including by helping Iraq maintain and expand its export of oil to support Iraqi development.
8.Promote support for Iraq from its neighbors, the region, and the international community.