So what's more reasonable, then?
Thinking the administration might consider an attack on Iran? Or that it's a good idea to nuke Tehran?
Bush has been alternatively rattling sabres and crying wolf for his entire presidency. He's also made a lot of whacky mistakes. He has advisors who are far hawkier than your average American. Where do you get such faith in the man, to rule out unreasonable choices on his part as ones he would not make?