Okay, if I look at it again, I can see that.
However, if you look at other posts here, I'm not the only one who assumed you meant it the way I first saw it.
Switching our military from a Cold War approach to a more flexible response system was what Rumsfeld was all about.
Oddly, missions of the type where small, light forces make pinpoint strikes on terrorists without occupying a country or extensive use of ground troops don't seem to meet with much approval around here either.
