"Leading Republicans." I counted one Senator, and a maybe, both of whom have been on the opposite side of Bush on most things from day one.

No more or less significant than Lieberman, a "leading Democrat," being pro-war.

Would be interesting to see how the votes come out. The Democrats have no solutions of their own, and are desperate to avoid being seen in any way as the cause of a loss, whether that perception is accurate or not. This is why people like Hillary are dancing as fast as they can. Meanwhile, the Democratic "base" is furiously demanding the Democrats shut the war down NOW.