Collaborative relationship does not mean they were not in Iraq.

Current Events » in reply to "The Sept. 11 commission reported yesterday that it has found no "collaborative relationship"

REB — 2/16/2007 2:35:23 PM (archived)

We did not have a collaborative relationship with them either, yet they were in America.

And Al Qaeda did talk with Saddam. We have evidence of that.

The whole thread (12 posts)

Rumors on head of al Qaeda in Iraq being wounded or captured. - TB - 2/16/2007 5:34:31 AM
- Yep. False alarm again. - TB - 2/16/2007 5:56:00 AM
  - Boy, howdy! There weren't any al-Qaeda running 'round when Saddam ran the country. - Bowser - 2/16/2007 7:05:27 AM
    - Sure there were. And they were also in America killing Americans (See 9/11) - REB - 2/16/2007 1:54:46 PM
      - "The Sept. 11 commission reported yesterday that it has found no "collaborative relationship" - Bowser - 2/16/2007 2:22:42 PM
        
        Collaborative relationship does not mean they were not in Iraq. - REB - 2/16/2007 2:35:23 PM
        
        And to jump ahead to your next post. You said there were no Al Qaeda in Iraq undder Saddam. This is not true. - REB - 2/16/2007 2:38:39 PM
        
        Evidence, hearsay and wishful thinking. - Bowser - 2/16/2007 5:15:59 PM
        
        You said no Al Qaeda was in Saddam's Iraq like it was a fact. Yet you can not know that. - REB - 2/16/2007 5:51:08 PM
        
        re: And to jump ahead to your next post. - SteveS - 2/16/2007 3:04:14 PM
        
        He'll ignore this. But thanks for posting it. Good info. - REB - 2/16/2007 3:13:27 PM
        
        "Saddam was starving his people by building palaces instead of feeding them" - Lindy - 2/16/2007 6:33:24 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (12 posts)