All those big grants have obviously impacted your thinking. Aside from the sheer odiousness of this topic (shooting people is generally considered bad form, outside the Bush Asminsitration, that is), can you find the flaw in your reasoning here?

I'll make it easy for you: What are the minimal resources for the proposed task? What are the expendatures you have proposed to meet the task?

In Arrel form:

ZOG: "Me ugh not like Heraclit-ugh. We need Club Heraclit-ugh"
ZAK:"Stands to reason, ook, we then need find club. Lets Write grant for BIIIG chief"
ZOG:"Yargh, ugh, and Zen-ugh too. He confuze ZOG. ZOG not c-ugh-nitively advanced en-ugh to resaon about discrete infinitessim-ughs"
ZAK: "Then we need write a grant for TWO clubs, er, um, 'ugh.' "

Find the flaw in ZAKs reasoning.....

After that, can we please suspend the discussion of shooting anyone? No matter how much in jest it is, I have grown weary of the immediacy of that as a proposed solution to every problem in our current political climate.

Yeti