re: Can you refrain from judgment until after the testimony?

Current Events » in reply to Can you refrain from judgment until after the testimony?

Lindy — 3/26/2007 3:20:48 AM (archived)

>"Gonzales has said he participated in no discussions and saw no memos about plans to carry out the firings on Dec. 7th."

Yet,
>"His schedule shows he attended at least one hourlong meeting, on Nov. 27, where he approved a detailed plan to execute the prosecutorsâ€™ firings."

This came from his office, one he represents. You think they could get it past him without his permission?
I think his goose is cooked. And I hope it gets fried too.

The whole thread (12 posts)

Conservative Culture of Corruption continues. - Bowser - 3/25/2007 5:18:05 PM
- Can you refrain from judgment until after the testimony? - RobVG - 3/25/2007 9:15:26 PM
  - GONZO Meter Says........... - Lindy - 3/27/2007 2:21:24 AM
  - re: Can you refrain from judgment until after the testimony? - Lindy - 3/26/2007 3:20:48 AM
  - The issue is the honesty of the AG, not WHY they were fired. (n/t) - Bowser - 3/25/2007 9:22:21 PM
    - That's what i said dipstick. (n/t) - RobVG - 3/25/2007 9:36:48 PM
      - Is that "dipstick" in the perjorative sense? (n/t) - Bowser - 3/26/2007 3:47:49 AM
        
        re: Is there a complimentary version of "dipstick?" - TB - 3/26/2007 3:38:12 PM
        
        Maybe not complimentary, but useful - Fox - 3/27/2007 4:31:54 PM
        
        Interchangeable with 'knucklehead'. :) (n/t) - RobVG - 3/26/2007 4:01:34 AM
        
        I suspected so. Just checking. :-) (n/t) - Bowser - 3/26/2007 4:14:01 AM
- Hagel, Specter and Graham against Bush? What else is new. - TB - 3/25/2007 7:24:02 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (12 posts)