Again I point out those you are disrespecting work for NASA contractors, NASA supported universities and at NASA and they are young and newly forming minds. The current or future employees of NASA. It is clear you are old guard and a stick in the mud.

I'm admittedly slightly embarrassed by the small number of peer reviewed papers at obscure publications out of 60 some crews over about 6 years of activities at MDRS. But they do exist if looked for and it is clear you are not will to look and have opinions based on nothing. As you have now change from non exist to their papers are useless...I don't accept your opinion of papers you haven't read.

On peer review: I have read lots of papers from many scientific peer review journals (often paying a large amount of money for the reprint). Many peers reviews it seems are based on who is being reviewed. If you have been reviewer long enough you know who's work you're reviewing even if their name isn't on the paper. Or maybe it is how much reviewers want the subject of the article to be "true" not on the actual scientific truth in the paper.

Don't like how I write to you? You must live in an isolated world of late nights at the center. Get out go talk to people like Burt Rutan. Or any person who has a less than stellar view of your NASA bureaucracy who works with NASA anyway.