second that

Daniel — 5/9/2007 6:48:48 PM (archived)

Beautifully done, with real soul too.

Even though the robots did sometimes look a bit like Imacs - that CGI wasn't 100 percent convincing somehow. But maybe that will work for the film in the long run - giving them that sort of 'eerie' look.

The whole thread (18 posts)

Just For Fun - Jody - 5/8/2007 5:04:12 PM
- My criteria for a great movie is: - Jody - 5/10/2007 11:25:38 AM
- Starship Troopers??? - Eri - 5/9/2007 3:19:29 AM
- I am familiar with all but four - FrankC - 5/9/2007 1:52:01 AM
  - 12 Monkeys and Gattaca - Fox - 5/9/2007 2:39:48 AM
    - I Robot. - Rob - 5/9/2007 3:18:13 AM
      - second that - Daniel - 5/9/2007 6:48:48 PM
      - Futurama and Galaxy Quest but ni MIB, you are correct Rob (n/t) - FrankC - 5/9/2007 4:49:29 AM
      - VG (n/t) - (anonymous) - 5/9/2007 3:18:51 AM
- Maybe "2001" is not considered "entertaining":-( - Raoul - 5/8/2007 9:31:05 PM
  - re:I have been told to see 2001 - Jody - 5/8/2007 10:18:57 PM
- No Star Wars (1977)? - REB - 5/8/2007 6:05:56 PM
- re:Addendum...from the past 25 years (n/t) - Jody - 5/8/2007 5:37:09 PM
  - Ok...1968 is almost 40 years ago; you're right! (n/t) - Raoul - 5/8/2007 9:52:55 PM
    - True, and 1977 is 30 years ago. - REB - 5/8/2007 9:55:31 PM
      - Which also excludes "Soylent Green" and "Close Encounters" (n/t) - Fox - 5/9/2007 5:40:36 PM
        
        Oh..yeah..I forgot those two...they were great (n/t) - Jody - 5/9/2007 11:59:18 PM
        
        Close Encounters - REB - 5/9/2007 6:52:23 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Off Topic

The whole thread (18 posts)