Look, I have no idea how valid the internet polls are but I suspect some truth in them and some attempt by the MSM to showcase candidates that they know will relate more to ratings because of their name recognition.

I also know that the same kind of trend was going on early in Ross Perot's campaign where the people found something interesting about his straight-forward, non-political message and he nearly stole an election much to the amazement of the media pundits. The only thing that really killed him was he fell for the conspiracy setup the Republicans laid on him.

You may see Paul as a nut but compared to the bs coming out of all the candidates from both parties, the ratio of common sense compared to the nuttiness is staggering in the man's message. He's too bright to fall for something like Perot did and there's this huge groundswell in the country to throw out the insiders. So would you support him over Hillary?

Art