Oh, its a cute theory....
Just lacking in ANY empiracal facts.... Fact number one is that there is no statistical reason to believe that there are increased percentages of losses there- this is pseudoscince hokum-
Off Topic » in reply to Did you see the Science Channel’s take on this?
Just lacking in ANY empiracal facts.... Fact number one is that there is no statistical reason to believe that there are increased percentages of losses there- this is pseudoscince hokum-