A person comes up with a theory/claim and hopefuilly some data or other evidence
to back up what they are saying. Other scientists are allowed to actually examine
the evidence (they insist on it, in fact) and see if it holds up. If it does, then we
have a new piece to our knowledge. If not, they carry on looking elsewhere.

How you have it is some guy claims to have all these images plus the British
government asked him about crop circles. Nothing can be shown but you insist
we have to believe him and you, even though there is no evidence. Do you
understand now how and why folks are not accepting your and his theory of
crop circles?

Science is not perfect, but it beats just about any other method for finding
the truth.

When your friend starts showing real evidence that can be examined by experts,
then we can talk. Until then it is your claim and his and I am not bound to buy
into it.