Posted by alcaray on: 8/1/2007 11:42:11 AM
In Reply to: re: Please read the information posted by Johannes on 8/1/2007 7:08:01 AM

It has nothing to do with science, other than some stolen terminology.

Is it illegal to use terminology that someone has used before?

It is possible that you do not understand my question or you do not understand its importance.

My philosophy is that anything is possible.;-)

If one claims to be able to show something with an equation, then one can demonstrate how the mathmatical link is made.

Did you read the following part in the [a href=“http://spacereligion.com/More_of_the_theory.php”]web page[/a] that I gave you?

I was under the impression that this is the information that you were eluding to.
That is why I asked you to read all of the information.

The protomass bubble has a surface area, surface areas are measured in “squares” so that mass is composed of potential (force) “U” divided by kinetic (force) “K” or M = U/K, where U=CM^2 and K=(U/M)/C, and E=(U/K)C, .
The numerical value of mass (M) is the same as that of protomass (K).
The U and the K are intrinsic to each other, so the values must be obtained from the same source.

It does not require being able to derive the equation (I can grasp some of the ramifications of E=MC*2, for instance, though my math studies stopped short of Lorentz transformations.). And it certainly does not require a reliance on philosophy nor religion.

I agree

There is simply no place for miracles in mathmatics. If your proof requires one or if it requires application of religion or philosophy or faith, then it is no proof. In some other universe than ours, maybe it would. But we have to play the hand we are dealt.

I agree

If you really want to make a contribution (you seem quite passionate about it) then start at the bottom and work your way up - take all the math and physics you can at your local community college. I recommend you also study a science that is built upon experimentation using inductive logic as well. Come back when you've completed it, in 2 years or so and we can have this discussion again from a new perspective.

If I was 50 years younger I could take your advise, but these days all I want to do is scan such information.

Thanks again for your input.

http://space-religion.com/More_of_the_theory.php

Johannes