Space/Science — HabitableZone

Space/Science » in reply to Further Resolution of the Solar Neutrino Mystery

More like nice PR spin.

"The two components cannot be disentangled at this stage and the presence of other background sources to this number cannot be excluded. Thus the contribution to the CNO component cannot be extracted from this number."

What's more, when one reads the paper and sees how they calculated fiducial mass to get their final estimated neutrino count - one realizes its more playing games with the mass numbers to arrive at the desired quantity.

Target 49 counts per day, per 100 tons for oscillating neutrinos? Adjust your equation for fiducial mass and viola - 47 counts achieved.

Fiducial mass equations allows them to come up, within reason, with whatever count they wanted to achieve. They estimate they are within 25% uncertainty of estimated fiducial mass. 25% is no minor amount.

Color me very skeptical.

;-)

This is another case of telling people what they want to hear and getting paid for doing so. It applies to the scientific community just as much as it does to the rest of the world.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (2 posts)