Again...
Why are you taking this study as some sort of refutation of global warming? Its about precipitation levels in Antartica. The authors of the study say as much:
"Climate warming is taking place in the Antarctic, but to a lesser extent than it is in the Arctic or the rest of the world," he told VICE News. "It's affecting part of Antarctica, the peninsula and West Antarctica, which are losing mass faster now than they did 10-15 years ago. But the large interior of Antarctica is gaining mass."
So lets be clear here, TB, you claim -without explaining why- that this study exposes some aspect of the global warming hoax- when even the study authors say the opposite. Why should we take your word for it over the people that actually did the study- especially since you repeatedly demonstrate that you are completely misinformed on the subject.
I find it significant that the usual players are piling on this poor guy like a pack of wolves. I guess this is how “consensus” is formed. It is not a sign of a confident position.
What piling on are you talking about? I don't see it... what I do see are scientists like Phil Plaitt explaining that the wild claims being made by the blogs you apparently rely on are completely unjustified...
The only thing this exposes is your ignorance on the topic...