"Ronald Reagan ending the Cold War..."
Yeah, had nothin' to do with it.
"liberal bias in the media..."
Yeah, and Fox News is fair and balanced.
"how the private sector is so much more efficient than the government..."
Buy anything from the Soviet Union lately? How about China*?
"And how about Saddam’s arsenal of WMD?"...
It existed. Evidence of it's destruction didn't, unless you took 'Baghdad Bob's" word for it.
"Or the tax cuts that weren’t going to drive the federal government into deficit"
I don't agree with the tax cuts but it was the war, spending and a drop in tax revenue that due to a recession that caused the deficits.
George Will manages to get his point across without calling everyone "liars".
Today conservatives tend to favor freedom, and consequently are inclined to be somewhat sanguine about inequalities of outcomes. Liberals are more concerned with equality, understood, they insist, primarily as equality of opportunity, not of outcome.
Liberals tend, however, to infer unequal opportunities from the fact of unequal outcomes. Hence liberalism's goal of achieving greater equality of condition leads to a larger scope for interventionist government to circumscribe the market's role in allocating wealth and opportunity. Liberalism increasingly seeks to deliver equality in the form of equal dependence of more and more people for more and more things on government.
cite Washington Post
*Read The China Model
