None of you live in Las Vegas as far as I can tell.
Regardless!
You should still show contempt and dismay over your HOMELAND SECURITY
agency for its rash pronouncement that there appears to be no signs of terrorist activity in this latest event.

Really?
Since when does HOMELAND SECURITY start to play the role of Daniel Webster
and redefine the dictionary meaning of terrorism?

Hey! If a bad guy, who has literature on ANARCHISM, who had a small arsenal of firearms,
ends up dying from ricin that he was exposed to, possibly from two vials of that deadly stuff
he possessed for reasons that are obvious [for killing large numbers of people], then he
was/is a TERRORIST.
If it walks like a duck, it quacks like a duck...

A 100 years before Al Qaeda, America suffered a different kind of terrorism: ANARCHISM.
One such anarchist claimed the life of a President, and lead to the formation of the FBI.

One wonders what that bad guy would have done with those two vials of ricin.
If the vials contained a few grams of the stuff [500 micrograms is all you need to kill with]
then the guy could have snuffed out over 1,000 victims in Vegas simply by sprinkling
the deadly stuff onto bakery goods, fruit, vegetables at local supermarkets.
The Sin City dodged a bullet....this time.