Space/Science — HabitableZone

Space/Science » in reply to re: The Two Gigayear Delay

re: The Two Gigayear Delay

"I wonder what life here will develop into during the next 2.4 billion years."

Genetic evolution is worse than watching grass grow. What is zillions of times faster is human evolution- the "software" rather than the "hardware".
Of course with human evolution the software can change the hardware. So, there is a chance we will have dinosaurs in our future along with never before "seen" types of life.

The human software has already changed the hardware in itself and in other lifeforms- which we normally called domestication- cats, dogs, cows, grapes, apples, corn, etc.
and of course humans will probably continue to do this.

For instance without using any high tech, it's possible humans could alter other primates- given only a couple thousand years. Just with the type of interaction as we have have with other domesticated animals.

Using the high tech at moment, and/or higher tech of future it seems probably that we will alter our hardware and make other types of creature and could do this within 100 years or within a few centuries.

The God-type question of any evolution- whether one is talking about hardware or software- is it progressive [or ever "improving"]? To me this is somewhat unclear.

Some famous evolutionary biologists normally think of the long slow evolution of hardware as mostly been random affair- the environment changes and best randomly selected variant is more successful at breeding. That this process is not progressive. So the human isn't a result that is "better" or best from long process of evolution- but is best thought of as merely an accidental occurrence.

But these same evolutionary biologists would probably think there is at least a possibility of progressive evolution in terms of software- and they are probably lefties and atheists. This last aspect isn't uncommon, most people usually think that the human software will get better in the future- history seems to support this idea in general [though there is also this general assumption being if we don't kill everyone with our technology- i.e nuclear weapons].

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (13 posts)