Sure, SETI folk are often trained in science, and rely on scientific equipment.
But...guess what?... They put forth their supposition on what grounds?
Where's their proof? Where's their evidence?
And is their pursuit or search for an hypothetical ET purely science?
Pure science?
Show me pure science, Larry?
There is always a subjective input, or nonscientific input into science.
Otherwise, humans wouldn't be humans.
And science isn't always repreducible results.
There's a gray area.
Religion doesn't have to have a Deity or what is called a God to make it a religion.
There are substitutes for that concept called God.
The Websters and Oxford dictionaries both have broader
definitions for religion than that.
EXAMPLE: In America, football is considered a religion by some,
so why shouldn't a nonsubstantiated branch of 'science' be one too?
Space/Science » in reply to A statment made without merit or knowledge
Then where's the scientific evidence, or proof for SETI's claims?
The whole thread (36 posts)
- POPE and Vatican ENDORSE ET's exist
- Just because the pope says something, doesn't necessarily mean it reflects a reality or truth. (n/t)
- re: POPE and Vatican ENDORSE ET's exist
- Not all that new.
- Religious fundamentalists are no fans of alien life
- Few and far between.
- re: Few and far between.
- re: Few and far between.
- re: Few and far between.
- Few and far between.
- Religious fundamentalists are no fans of alien life
- Against the Empire
