The thing is, liquid water. Obviously there is no liquid water to be found on Mars today.
You know, I must have missed the part in the article where they claimed that Mars lithosphere is cold and hard all the way into the center, and where they claimed Mars' lithosphere was cold and hard in the equatorial regions.
I guess that depends on what the definitions of on and in are.
Yes Mars is cold and hard, but everywhere we look, we see evidence of water. That seems to be in direct conflict with many of Nick's closely held theories.
Nick's theories, quite honestly, don't hold water, now, or then. I have very little confidence in Nick's crackpot theories, not now, not then, not ever. It has something to do with his embracing fossil fuel industry funding for his work.
Once a crudge, always a crudge, or so it seems with Nick and the rest here.
Space/Science » in reply to re: Not "just" underneath the surface
re: Not "just" underneath the surface
The whole thread (42 posts)
- Well, Nick?..You're Mars theory has received it's most vital support evidence to date.
- Your inference that Mars harbors no pathogens is not supported
- Tharsis Bulge.
- Yet we still know very little
- re: Well, Nick?..You're Mars theory has received it's most vital support evidence to date.