re: Occam's Razor

Space/Science » in reply to Occam's Razor

re: Occam's Razor

Marcia — 5/30/2008 10:38:25 PM (archived)

"Heuristic ego preservation. "

I have no idea as to what you've applied above, but Occam's Raxor has mainly to do with the "simplest solution, is best". Ask a question, think about the problem and there you go, the answer should be there or not as far.

The whole thread (26 posts)

Why is there anything? - Jody - 5/27/2008 3:36:06 PM
- God wants it that way - TAFKASE - 5/30/2008 5:38:49 AM
  - It's turtles, all the way down ;-) (n/t) - McFly - 5/31/2008 2:09:33 AM
  - "Makes as much sense as anything else. " - ARRELL - 5/30/2008 9:11:36 PM
- Thank You Zoners... (n/t) - Jody - 5/29/2008 2:14:11 AM
  - Higgs-boson - Jody - 5/29/2008 1:05:41 PM
- A slight k-meson decay assymetry - Adam - 5/28/2008 10:40:20 PM
- Why is it that the simplest questions are always the most profound? (n/t) - ER - 5/28/2008 12:13:20 PM
  - re: Why is it that the simplest questions are always the most profound? - Marcia - 5/28/2008 5:54:03 PM
    - Occam's Razor - JEKing - 5/30/2008 10:07:06 PM
      - re: Occam's Razor - Marcia - 5/30/2008 10:38:25 PM
        
        re: Occam's Razor - JEKing - 5/31/2008 3:13:02 PM
    - re: Sorry, here... - Marcia - 5/28/2008 5:57:17 PM
- Cogito Ergo Sum - nick hoffman - 5/28/2008 8:32:03 AM
- Because... - SDAI-Tech1 - 5/28/2008 6:58:12 AM
  - re: I think that - Johannes - 5/30/2008 1:54:44 AM
- re: Why is there anything? - ARRELL - 5/28/2008 4:52:40 AM
  - MY link had cute little pictures. - TB - 5/28/2008 4:56:32 AM
- re: Why is there anything? - Bowser - 5/27/2008 8:04:01 PM
- Because the alternative is inconceivable. (n/t) - ER - 5/27/2008 6:36:51 PM
  - Literally! (n/t) - TB - 5/27/2008 10:03:26 PM
- Nobody really knows. - TB - 5/27/2008 4:36:05 PM
- re: Why ? - Raoul - 5/27/2008 3:58:31 PM
  - And another cosmic question - Socrates II - 5/28/2008 5:16:37 PM
    - Time is defined thermodynamically, not dynamically. - ER - 5/28/2008 5:43:37 PM
      - re: Time is defined thermodynamically, not dynamically. - Marcia - 5/28/2008 6:01:16 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (26 posts)