I can't get you to see the most critical part of it, can I?

Maybe an analogy:

If there's a problem with medical care for old people, and the most prominent solution being proposed was forced euthanasia at age 65, can you understand that someone's fervent opposition to that solution is not the same thing at all as saying there is no problem with medical care for old people?

Believe me, the movers and shakers of the modern environmental movement are not the ones you want calling the shots on this.

You did a great post on nuclear power. And yet, I would be willing to bet that nuclear power will continue to be swept aside in favor of solutions that involve forced contraction of the economy, rationing, and control of all industrial and personal activities. Oh, yeah, and a LOT of new taxes to be distributed to favored industries and people.

We'll see. I'm willing to be proven wrong. If they're honest about this being about the Earth, they're going to focus on China and India in future international discussions. If it keeps being about cutting Amerikkka down to size, then maybe people will finally get a clue.