As conservatives stack stupidity (Trump, eg) upon stupidity (Cruz, eg, and then add stupidity (intelligent design, eg), and promote these ridiculous notions as so-called news (Fox, eg), when they add somethinng like "Conservapedia" to the mix it's deserving of comment.
After all, it's not the first screwy idea nor is it the last attempt to distort reality and dupe the already intellectually challenged. Bubba has his guns at the ready to defend to the death his right to be stupid and all the various ways Conservatives have to foster, promote, enhance his ignorance simply make him more dangerous.
Those are worth noting and comment. As soon as I see Billy Graham, and Fox News, Donald Trump and Cruz repudiate Conservapedia I'll agree with you. Until then I believe it's fair to comment upon it as representative of a fair number of the folks at whom it's directed.
Flame » in reply to It is amazing to me...
Frank, ya gotta understand.
The whole thread (22 posts)
- "Conservapedia - the US religious right's answer to Wikipedia"
- It is amazing to me...
- Wait until Conservatives demand equal time for their citations.
- So how many conservatives do you think subscribe.
- All you need to know about it...
- What does it mean to say that an open-source encyclopedia has a "liberal bias"?