That's nice
But does that mean I have to agree with him?
Funny how you support science - or at least certain scientists - when they say or
do something to back you up, but otherwise it's let's play devil's advocate or at
least try to look like the next Galileo for you. Or maybe Bruno, who wasn't really
a scientist but some tried to make him out to be a major revolutionary. He only
took bits and pieces of then-new ideas for his own brand of theology.
If you really knew Jastrow he would find most of your ideas to be anything but
scientific, plus he was part of the "establishment".