PNAS is often junk science

Space/Science » in reply to Read the NEW research.

nick hoffman — 8/14/2008 10:17:44 PM (archived)

It's a graveyard for "political" science that can't get published in the mainstream.

Let's sit and think about Phoenix for a while - and wait for the FULL results to come in - there will be more surprises and puzzles yet, I'm sure...

The whole thread (9 posts)

Most Mars experts now doubt the conclusion of no organics on Mars. - Robert Clark - 8/14/2008 1:19:35 PM
- I think you may have it a bit mixed up - Algorithms - 8/14/2008 1:34:42 PM
  - re: I think you may have it a bit mixed up. - Well said... all well said. (n/t) - Marcia - 8/15/2008 5:55:28 AM
  - Read the NEW research. - Robert Clark - 8/14/2008 6:08:26 PM
    - About detecting perchlorates and organics with the TEGA instrument. - Robert Clark - 8/22/2008 2:27:26 PM
      - Question about the "evaporation sequence". - Robert Clark - 8/25/2008 4:40:08 AM
    - PNAS is often junk science - nick hoffman - 8/14/2008 10:17:44 PM
      - re: PNAS is often junk science - Andrew - 8/22/2008 5:23:44 PM
      - Organics could still have been in the Phoenix samples. - Robert Clark - 8/22/2008 2:13:35 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (9 posts)