No. Soros IS the most relevant name at this time.
The man generates no wealth. He is purely a speculative cash accumulator who has written books about the need to take down America's status as superpower.
He is the money behind the leftist progressive movement.
He is the money and man behind Obama.
There are a LOT of money manipulators, but none who hate America like Soros does and who have spent their money tirelessly to destroy America.
My foundations support people in the country who care about an open society. It's their work that I'm supporting. So it's not me doing it. But I can empower them. I can support them
By taking Soros money Obama is saying he is either willing to be a Soros "Open Society & Anti-America" puppet or he doesn't care who the money comes from. I.m hoping for the latter but either one doesn't bode well. And it's obvious Soros will practically own Obama if Obama is looking for two terms.
Karl Popper.
That's Soros role model and the direction he wants to take America and the world. A man who said Darwinism was a metaphysical theory.
In his universe, Soros wants to remake "World 1" in his fantasy image by manipulating currency. Then "World 2" and "World 3" will come into perfect alignment with his social Popperism.
Should we not be concerned about someone who is amazingly successful in motivating the manipulatable masses, walking hand in glove with our likely future President, to twist the world into his bizarre worldview?
