re: But this articles explanation is better

Space/Science » in reply to But this articles explanation is better

alcaray — 10/27/2008 6:24:34 PM (archived)

I gave the link to the thread I was talking about. Go to the link in your post in that thread to find the piece that started it all. Go to the link in my post in that thread to find a slightly better piece on the same subject. You are correct that there is more detail in dtb's link, in this thread.

I will be happy to provide whatever link you like, but I don't understand what you want.

The whole thread (10 posts)

Mars "Borealis" impact and magnetic dichotomy - dtb - 10/24/2008 10:19:24 PM
- re: Mars "Borealis" impact and magnetic dichotomy - peanut gallery... - 10/27/2008 2:10:53 PM
  - What's new here? - dtb - 10/27/2008 3:57:17 PM
    - I read the paper. - Mr. Peanut - 10/27/2008 6:49:42 PM
- Fascinatingt, thanks for the link - E.P. - 10/25/2008 4:46:29 PM
  - Offered only for educational purposes... - alcaray - 10/26/2008 7:26:54 PM
    - But this articles explanation is better - E.P. - 10/27/2008 3:12:50 PM
      - re: But this articles explanation is better - alcaray - 10/27/2008 6:24:34 PM
  - Thanks for your your thanks - nick hoffman - 10/26/2008 10:51:22 AM
    - Speaking of Martian impacts - Socrates II - 10/27/2008 6:39:49 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (10 posts)