re: Bull is right - NO, not all stars have exoplanets. – Space/Science

Space/Science » in reply to re: Bull is right - NO, not all stars have exoplanets.

re: Bull is right - NO, not all stars have exoplanets.

Post Sputnik — 11/8/2008 3:07:51 AM (archived)

Show me a single star that has been demonstrated to NOT have a planet.

For planet I use the 'rational definition' - gravity induced sphericity.

I suspect you are going to be looking for a long time.

The whole thread (14 posts)

No Earthlike Planets Around Alpha Centauri A or B - phil - 11/7/2008 8:26:06 PM
- What a load of malarkey! - Adam - 11/11/2008 11:22:00 AM
- what about post-formation migration of planets, though? - pwokenyaw - 11/8/2008 1:03:36 AM
- Using our current methods of exoplanet detection... - Socrates II - 11/7/2008 9:00:42 PM
  - re: Using our current methods of exoplanet detection... - phil - 11/7/2008 9:16:21 PM
    - re: Bull - z - 11/8/2008 12:26:13 AM
      - Great Balls of Fire - ER - 11/10/2008 5:43:27 PM
      - re: Bull is right - NO, not all stars have exoplanets. - Marcia - 11/8/2008 2:05:09 AM
        
        re: Bull is right - NO, not all stars have exoplanets. - Post Sputnik - 11/8/2008 3:07:51 AM
        
        re: Bull is right - NO, not all stars have exoplanets. - Marcia - 11/8/2008 4:20:30 AM
        
        re: Bull is right - NO, not all stars have exoplanets. - gbaikie - 11/8/2008 5:24:53 AM
        
        re: Bull is right - NO, not all stars have exoplanets. - Marcia - 11/10/2008 1:57:10 AM
        
        re: Bull is right - NO, not all stars have exoplanets. - gbaikie - 11/10/2008 3:50:57 AM
        
        It depends on what the meaning of 'are' is. - Post Sputnik - 11/8/2008 5:06:30 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (14 posts)