I'm sorry- I don't understand. Is this a 'Well, he is better than Saddam' type argument or ....
....is this one of those arguments that involve universes that don't exist- like 'in some universe being less unpopular than someone else, but still more unpopular than any president in history is a good thing' type arguments?
Sorry, it must be my high-brow effete academic ivory tower mentality that keeps me from seeing your point. Or, it could be I was raised on a farm in Oklahoma and I know bullshit when I see it.
Yeti
