which you clearly read through your own filter of damage control. The overriding theme to what I said is that the current stories were believable precisely because they fit what we all were seeing about the woman and none of that perception has been proven wrong.
No matter if people got fooled (and I think that happened to folks on both sides of the aisle), I'm pretty sure nobody's impression of Governor If You Give a Moose a Muffin changed one iota with your recent findings.
While you're wringing your hands with glee finding out that people mistook parody for truth because the parody was too close to the truth, Sarah Palin is still an intellectual lightweight and has serious ethical challenges. Enjoy your tiny victory. We'll try not to giggle.
Art
Current Events » in reply to "Serious pundits?"
I completely stand by that post
The whole thread (21 posts)
- Media falls for hoaxter
- Did anyone stop to ask- What are the odds of 2 high-level Republican leaders not knowing that Africa wasn't a country? (n/t)
- Half a hoax, the Palin ignorance part is true. The hoax is limited to WHO leaked it.
- Maybe you should ask
- I'm more disappointed that
- re: Media falls for hoaxter