But no limits on welfare CEO compensation.
So you sense a lack of consistentcy here? Maybe a bit of ridiculousness? What might be called, in less polite circles, "hypocrisy"? We wouldn't use that word here, of course, but in lesser company some of the cruder people might use that term. And by right, by the way.
Why shouldn't people who work by the hour be well compensated?
Arf (They hate working people, Bow. Obviously, it's the Stockholm Syndrome, Conservative genius.)